(Aired on February 25, 2010)
The federal government is walking a fine line between success and disaster as we try to recover from our faltering slide in late 2008 and most of 2009. There are indications that interest rates will start to rise this summer, and although I am not some kind of financial guru, I can tell you right now that if that happens, we will head right back down the slippery slope we so recently started to climb up.
With personal debt at virtually record levels, and many people overextended in their personal lives, raising interest rates will make personal bankruptcies soar. They're already up some 27% this year, as people try to make it through tough times. To raise interest rates further will be disastrous. U.S. financial boss Ben Bernanke made the same comments yesterday. He's worried that if interest rates rise, the U.S. economic recovery will fail, and we all know what that means.
I am in favor of what the government is doing regarding putting new rules in place that will force people not to overextend themselves. Rules for purchasing homes that will restrict the amount of money that can be tied up in mortgages are badly needed. Many have been tempted to stretch themselves far too much to get into a home with low interest rates, and they've put themselves in trouble. To raise interest rates to stop that is not the answer. Education, and new rules to prevent that problem make much more sense.
There is concern that if inflation rises, higher interest rates will be needed. But from what I've been able to determine from the experts, rising interest rates will bring on way more problems than they will fix. Let's hope the government sees the light, and keeps interest rates low until we get out of the quagmire.
Friday, February 26, 2010
Thursday, February 25, 2010
School Decision Brings Out the Worst in Some
(Aired on February 24, 2010)
You may be disappointed expecting the best in people, but you'll never be disappointed preparing for the worst. That message was driven home loud and clear shortly after this week's school board meeting.
The board had just finished the agonizing process of voting to close three elementary schools in the city. Some parents were disappointed, others relieved that their schools were spared.
I was conducting an interview with Chair Ken Christian in a mostly empty board room, when I heard a commotion behind me. Someone was shouting. It turns out a parent had stayed behind, and had found Trustee Kathleen Karpuk. She was berating Karpuk for the board's decision that night, shouting at the top her lungs. Karpuk has recently had a child, and while she could easily have taken the meeting off with a very good reason, she decided to be there for the difficult process of decision-making.
The key here is that Trustee Karpuk was holding her newborn child while being verbally attacked by the parent. The incident was extremely upsetting, and I left feeling slightly shaken.
I realize that the decisions made by the board made some people angry. I realize that some hold the local trustees directly responsible for the current situation. That's fine - they're elected, though their real power is debatable considering the constraints placed on them by Slash Gordon and the Liberal government.
To shout at an individual trustee while she holds her newborn child crosses way over the line. It's rude, it's classless and it makes me wonder if we will get any quality candidates in the next municipal election.
You may be disappointed expecting the best in people, but you'll never be disappointed preparing for the worst. That message was driven home loud and clear shortly after this week's school board meeting.
The board had just finished the agonizing process of voting to close three elementary schools in the city. Some parents were disappointed, others relieved that their schools were spared.
I was conducting an interview with Chair Ken Christian in a mostly empty board room, when I heard a commotion behind me. Someone was shouting. It turns out a parent had stayed behind, and had found Trustee Kathleen Karpuk. She was berating Karpuk for the board's decision that night, shouting at the top her lungs. Karpuk has recently had a child, and while she could easily have taken the meeting off with a very good reason, she decided to be there for the difficult process of decision-making.
The key here is that Trustee Karpuk was holding her newborn child while being verbally attacked by the parent. The incident was extremely upsetting, and I left feeling slightly shaken.
I realize that the decisions made by the board made some people angry. I realize that some hold the local trustees directly responsible for the current situation. That's fine - they're elected, though their real power is debatable considering the constraints placed on them by Slash Gordon and the Liberal government.
To shout at an individual trustee while she holds her newborn child crosses way over the line. It's rude, it's classless and it makes me wonder if we will get any quality candidates in the next municipal election.
Wednesday, February 24, 2010
Schoenborn Verdict not a Crowd Pleaser
(Aired on February 23, 2010)
The decision yesterday by Mr. Justice Robert Powers to find Allan Schoenborn not criminally responsible for the death of his three children will not be a popular one. Indeed, many do not comprehend how a man could be found guilty of killing his children, understood the gravity of what he was doing, and yet somehow didn't have the capacity to understand whether it was morally right or wrong.
That he had some kind of mental issues I don't think anyone will dispute. What the general public is concerned about is- do those issues excuse him from jail time? Prosecutor Glenn Kelt might have put it best when he said our justice system doesn't punish people who are sufficiently mentally ill and aren't responsible for their actions.
If we knew that Schoenborn was going to be in a psychiatric facility for a long, long time, and getting treatment for his illness, we might be more satisfied. But most of us don't understand the complexities of treating the mentally ill, how the psychiatric facilities work, and we have this feeling that somehow, after a short period of time, someone will declare Schoenborn suddenly "cured" and he will walk back into society.
Mental illness is a tough thing to diagnose, and it is even tougher to treat. Many psychiatrists who testified at Schoenborn's trial indicated that it will be tough to treat him. It is not an easy decision to take. And many will see it as unfair. But in our justice system, and in a democracy, we have to place some faith in those who make those judgments. Taking on the office of judge involves taking on a grave, and yes, oppressive responsibility. I believe that Justice Powers gave a lot of thought to his decision, weighed everything thoroughly, and made what he felt was the right decision. And, in the end, that's what democracy is all about.
We don't agree with all the decisions, but in the end, we have to have faith that, after weighing all the evidence, the right decision was made. Having said that, I wonder if Darcie Clarke, the mother of the three slain children, can find peace with the judge's decision. I hardly think so.
The decision yesterday by Mr. Justice Robert Powers to find Allan Schoenborn not criminally responsible for the death of his three children will not be a popular one. Indeed, many do not comprehend how a man could be found guilty of killing his children, understood the gravity of what he was doing, and yet somehow didn't have the capacity to understand whether it was morally right or wrong.
That he had some kind of mental issues I don't think anyone will dispute. What the general public is concerned about is- do those issues excuse him from jail time? Prosecutor Glenn Kelt might have put it best when he said our justice system doesn't punish people who are sufficiently mentally ill and aren't responsible for their actions.
If we knew that Schoenborn was going to be in a psychiatric facility for a long, long time, and getting treatment for his illness, we might be more satisfied. But most of us don't understand the complexities of treating the mentally ill, how the psychiatric facilities work, and we have this feeling that somehow, after a short period of time, someone will declare Schoenborn suddenly "cured" and he will walk back into society.
Mental illness is a tough thing to diagnose, and it is even tougher to treat. Many psychiatrists who testified at Schoenborn's trial indicated that it will be tough to treat him. It is not an easy decision to take. And many will see it as unfair. But in our justice system, and in a democracy, we have to place some faith in those who make those judgments. Taking on the office of judge involves taking on a grave, and yes, oppressive responsibility. I believe that Justice Powers gave a lot of thought to his decision, weighed everything thoroughly, and made what he felt was the right decision. And, in the end, that's what democracy is all about.
We don't agree with all the decisions, but in the end, we have to have faith that, after weighing all the evidence, the right decision was made. Having said that, I wonder if Darcie Clarke, the mother of the three slain children, can find peace with the judge's decision. I hardly think so.
Tuesday, February 23, 2010
Not Owning the Podium, But Doing Just Fine
(Aired on February 22, 2010)
It is hard for me to come to grips with all the naysayers who are suggesting our athletes aren't performing up to par at the Winter Games. We said we were going to own the podium, but we're not, say the doom and gloomers.
And I say, we're doing just fine, thank you very much. We're fourth in the medal race, and while we aren't going to win more medals than any other nation on our home turf, we're doing pretty well. Some of our athletes haven't performed up to expectations. Maybe it's the pressure of the whole hometown fan situation, maybe it's the need to go 150% to win the gold that leaves us all open to errors that can take us from gold to nothing. But I think the Own the Podium campaign has worked well. We've invested some money in our high-end athletes, we've started developing programs that will give us strength in years to come, and we've made a good start for future world championships and Olympic games.
I think we've got a lot to be proud of. Our hockey team hasn't looked sharp, that's probably the biggest disappointment given the money these guys make, but when you give them no time to learn to work together, it's not an easy task no matter how good you are. To reach an Olympic podium or world championship takes as much luck as it does skill. Where one luge makes a bad turn and stays upright, another turns over. Where one inch either way can make or break a figure skating jump, when one wrong shift on a turn can take you out of contention in speed skating, or one bump can move you out of a medal in long track, the fickle finger of fate can lead to disaster.
But I believe we're on the right track, I believe our athletes are giving us everything they have. And I really don't think we can ask much more than that. Surely people didn't believe that Own the Podium really meant we were going to own it. It's a figure of speech. We're a small country and while some can argue we should be doing better, I think we're doing a great job.
It is hard for me to come to grips with all the naysayers who are suggesting our athletes aren't performing up to par at the Winter Games. We said we were going to own the podium, but we're not, say the doom and gloomers.
And I say, we're doing just fine, thank you very much. We're fourth in the medal race, and while we aren't going to win more medals than any other nation on our home turf, we're doing pretty well. Some of our athletes haven't performed up to expectations. Maybe it's the pressure of the whole hometown fan situation, maybe it's the need to go 150% to win the gold that leaves us all open to errors that can take us from gold to nothing. But I think the Own the Podium campaign has worked well. We've invested some money in our high-end athletes, we've started developing programs that will give us strength in years to come, and we've made a good start for future world championships and Olympic games.
I think we've got a lot to be proud of. Our hockey team hasn't looked sharp, that's probably the biggest disappointment given the money these guys make, but when you give them no time to learn to work together, it's not an easy task no matter how good you are. To reach an Olympic podium or world championship takes as much luck as it does skill. Where one luge makes a bad turn and stays upright, another turns over. Where one inch either way can make or break a figure skating jump, when one wrong shift on a turn can take you out of contention in speed skating, or one bump can move you out of a medal in long track, the fickle finger of fate can lead to disaster.
But I believe we're on the right track, I believe our athletes are giving us everything they have. And I really don't think we can ask much more than that. Surely people didn't believe that Own the Podium really meant we were going to own it. It's a figure of speech. We're a small country and while some can argue we should be doing better, I think we're doing a great job.
Monday, February 22, 2010
IHA Sweeps Dirty Surgical Tools Under the Rug
(Aired on February 19, 2010)
Under rug swept.
That's what the Interior Health Authority tried its best to do with a news conference today. CEO Dr. Robert Halpenny said he was confident that there has been no inordinate increase in infections because of dirty surgical equipment. He said he was confident that the sterilization equipment was working properly, meaning that even though the tools were technically dirty with blood, bone, and bits of other items, the dirt was clean. He said no human error was involved in the breakdown, so no one will lose their job. He said - first and foremost - the health authority is consumed with patient safety.
You get another idea when you talk with Dr. Richard McLeod. He's the surgeon who was forced to stop a surgery partway through just a few days ago, because the tools of his trade were dirty. Dr. McLeod says the thing that has shocked him the most is the fact that it took so long to do anything.
This issue has come forward long before the threat of media exposure forced to the health authority to really and truly deal with the problem. Certainly, before this week, someone in some position of authority said this is not the type of thing that should result in a full external review and a halt of elective surgeries.
It's that person who deserves the axe.
I am normally one to forgive pretty easily. But in this case, I have to believe someone - an actual human being - is ultimately responsible. And the public's confidence would only have been restored had that person been part of the cleansing.
Under rug swept.
That's what the Interior Health Authority tried its best to do with a news conference today. CEO Dr. Robert Halpenny said he was confident that there has been no inordinate increase in infections because of dirty surgical equipment. He said he was confident that the sterilization equipment was working properly, meaning that even though the tools were technically dirty with blood, bone, and bits of other items, the dirt was clean. He said no human error was involved in the breakdown, so no one will lose their job. He said - first and foremost - the health authority is consumed with patient safety.
You get another idea when you talk with Dr. Richard McLeod. He's the surgeon who was forced to stop a surgery partway through just a few days ago, because the tools of his trade were dirty. Dr. McLeod says the thing that has shocked him the most is the fact that it took so long to do anything.
This issue has come forward long before the threat of media exposure forced to the health authority to really and truly deal with the problem. Certainly, before this week, someone in some position of authority said this is not the type of thing that should result in a full external review and a halt of elective surgeries.
It's that person who deserves the axe.
I am normally one to forgive pretty easily. But in this case, I have to believe someone - an actual human being - is ultimately responsible. And the public's confidence would only have been restored had that person been part of the cleansing.
Friday, February 19, 2010
Asking the Tough Questions
(Aired on February 18, 2010)
The media are often portrayed as "bad guys" because sometimes we seem to be hounding people in our efforts to get answers to serious questions. I don't know how many times over the years I've been accused of badgering seemingly nice people and trying to make them look bad because that's all the media does - create sensational headlines. Isn't that why we do what we do?
But as a newsperson, I have also often been accused of being too nice and being too trusting, and I am. I always look for the good and not the bad. But sometimes you just have to ask the questions. While I am hesitant to judge too quickly, sometimes you have to act.
This week, we were made aware of a situation at Royal Inland Hospital where dirty surgical equipment was an issue for hospital staff. In probing, we find that some people are suggesting this has been a problem for quite some time. Someone has to be held accountable for this issue. Someone has to get to the bottom of it. This is a very dangerous situation. And the news media have been bang on in asking the tough questions. Who knows how long it would have taken to get this story out in the open, or whether serious health repercussions could have occurred, if someone had not tipped us off and we had not followed up.
While the tough questions are not easy, they must sometimes be asked. And while it seems that sometimes we're overly aggressive, and we probably are, still, in dealing with crises like these, the story has to be told. There are times when you have to be a pit bull and bite hard, and hold on until the truth is told. We're still holding on in this one, because at this point, we don't know where the problem is, what caused it, and what solutions will be undertaken to rectify it. I don't think the public would expect anything less, even if we have to ruffle a few feathers, and get under a few peoples' skins to get the answers.
We're not a perfect group, and sometimes we bark up the wrong tree. In this case, I think we've got the right tree, and we're going to keep barking until we get some answers.
The media are often portrayed as "bad guys" because sometimes we seem to be hounding people in our efforts to get answers to serious questions. I don't know how many times over the years I've been accused of badgering seemingly nice people and trying to make them look bad because that's all the media does - create sensational headlines. Isn't that why we do what we do?
But as a newsperson, I have also often been accused of being too nice and being too trusting, and I am. I always look for the good and not the bad. But sometimes you just have to ask the questions. While I am hesitant to judge too quickly, sometimes you have to act.
This week, we were made aware of a situation at Royal Inland Hospital where dirty surgical equipment was an issue for hospital staff. In probing, we find that some people are suggesting this has been a problem for quite some time. Someone has to be held accountable for this issue. Someone has to get to the bottom of it. This is a very dangerous situation. And the news media have been bang on in asking the tough questions. Who knows how long it would have taken to get this story out in the open, or whether serious health repercussions could have occurred, if someone had not tipped us off and we had not followed up.
While the tough questions are not easy, they must sometimes be asked. And while it seems that sometimes we're overly aggressive, and we probably are, still, in dealing with crises like these, the story has to be told. There are times when you have to be a pit bull and bite hard, and hold on until the truth is told. We're still holding on in this one, because at this point, we don't know where the problem is, what caused it, and what solutions will be undertaken to rectify it. I don't think the public would expect anything less, even if we have to ruffle a few feathers, and get under a few peoples' skins to get the answers.
We're not a perfect group, and sometimes we bark up the wrong tree. In this case, I think we've got the right tree, and we're going to keep barking until we get some answers.
Thursday, February 18, 2010
Dirty Surgeries at RIH Downright Frightening
(Aired on February 17, 2010)
The story we brought to you this week on dirty surgical tools at Royal Inland Hospital is a tough one to take. It's hard to know what actually constitutes an overreaction to this issue.
If you want to downplay the story, you can say that the surgeons are the last line of defence and they would be able to see if their tools are dirty. You could also say that it's a fairly minor issue being blown out of proportion.
But in talking to members of the public since the story broke, I haven't received that impression. No one thinks this is just a minor issue. The doctor who came forward is a well-respected surgeon at Royal Inland. If he is willing to put himself out there to expose this issue, then it's clearly nothing to sneeze at.
And it raises so many more questions. How prevalent is this problem? How long has it been going on? Who is responsible for the cleaning of the surgical equipment, and will that person be held accountable?
But then you take a step back and look at the broader implications of what's happened. Are these the same tools that are used for emergency surgeries, and if so, are emergency surgeries even safe? What has the rate of post-surgery infection been recently? Someone anonymously sent us an e-mail today, claiming to be a nurse at R.I.H., something we can't verify. This person said that he or she was ordered to carry out H.I.V. tests on patients post-surgery. Did any of these tests come back positive? Our newsroom is following up on all of these questions and many more.
Many people will react to this story and think it's simply disgusting. But it's more than that - it's terrifying. I.H.A. officials say they are making every effort now to ensure that the instruments are clean. It will take a monumental effort, though, to cleanse the hospital's reputation.
The story we brought to you this week on dirty surgical tools at Royal Inland Hospital is a tough one to take. It's hard to know what actually constitutes an overreaction to this issue.
If you want to downplay the story, you can say that the surgeons are the last line of defence and they would be able to see if their tools are dirty. You could also say that it's a fairly minor issue being blown out of proportion.
But in talking to members of the public since the story broke, I haven't received that impression. No one thinks this is just a minor issue. The doctor who came forward is a well-respected surgeon at Royal Inland. If he is willing to put himself out there to expose this issue, then it's clearly nothing to sneeze at.
And it raises so many more questions. How prevalent is this problem? How long has it been going on? Who is responsible for the cleaning of the surgical equipment, and will that person be held accountable?
But then you take a step back and look at the broader implications of what's happened. Are these the same tools that are used for emergency surgeries, and if so, are emergency surgeries even safe? What has the rate of post-surgery infection been recently? Someone anonymously sent us an e-mail today, claiming to be a nurse at R.I.H., something we can't verify. This person said that he or she was ordered to carry out H.I.V. tests on patients post-surgery. Did any of these tests come back positive? Our newsroom is following up on all of these questions and many more.
Many people will react to this story and think it's simply disgusting. But it's more than that - it's terrifying. I.H.A. officials say they are making every effort now to ensure that the instruments are clean. It will take a monumental effort, though, to cleanse the hospital's reputation.
Wednesday, February 17, 2010
New Mortgage Rules Wise
(Aired on February 16, 2010)
It is probably a wise move for the federal government to put some new rules in place for people to qualify for a mortgage to buy a home. Some kind of mortgage affordability test is probably necessary in light of the fact that there is real concern we're taking on way more debt than we should. With the hot housing market, low interest rates and a new crop of people looking for first time homes, people have been stretching themselves to the limit. Older people, meanwhile, have been borrowing heavily against their homes.
While Finance Minister Jim Flaherty is absolutely right that we don't have a housing bubble yet, there is concern that if the economy struggles for too long, many of those with extended debt will have their feet cut out from under them. And that would be a troubling thought.
The government is facing a fine line here. They don't want to put the brakes on the fragile economic recovery, but they also must ensure that we don't let people extend themselves too far. That could create more problems down the road. And when you look at the results of a new study showing that household debt as a whole is soaring, the time has come for some restraint. Average debt climbed to $96,000 last year. That puts the debt to income ratio at 145%, the highest ever recorded. There was also a dramatic increase in late debt payments. So when you combine all those factors together, it becomes pretty clear that we need to get a better hold on our personal finances, and live more within our means.
No one is suggesting we're in a panic mode, but sometimes, as the saying goes, an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.
It is probably a wise move for the federal government to put some new rules in place for people to qualify for a mortgage to buy a home. Some kind of mortgage affordability test is probably necessary in light of the fact that there is real concern we're taking on way more debt than we should. With the hot housing market, low interest rates and a new crop of people looking for first time homes, people have been stretching themselves to the limit. Older people, meanwhile, have been borrowing heavily against their homes.
While Finance Minister Jim Flaherty is absolutely right that we don't have a housing bubble yet, there is concern that if the economy struggles for too long, many of those with extended debt will have their feet cut out from under them. And that would be a troubling thought.
The government is facing a fine line here. They don't want to put the brakes on the fragile economic recovery, but they also must ensure that we don't let people extend themselves too far. That could create more problems down the road. And when you look at the results of a new study showing that household debt as a whole is soaring, the time has come for some restraint. Average debt climbed to $96,000 last year. That puts the debt to income ratio at 145%, the highest ever recorded. There was also a dramatic increase in late debt payments. So when you combine all those factors together, it becomes pretty clear that we need to get a better hold on our personal finances, and live more within our means.
No one is suggesting we're in a panic mode, but sometimes, as the saying goes, an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.
Tuesday, February 16, 2010
Violence Detracts from Legitimate Olympic Protests
(Aired on February 15, 2010)
A civil liberties advocate is concerned Saturday's protests in Vancouver may have diverted the message away from legitimate protesters taking advantage of the world spotlight for the Olympic Games. You think?
Legitimate protesters who have legitimate concerns are now in the unenviable position of losing their momentum on the world stage after 200 protesters smashed windows, spray painted vehicles and caused havoc while marching through the downtown core. It was an absolutely abysmal display. And did it take away from the protesters' message? Of course. How could it not?
When I was out and about on the weekend, at the local coffee shops, in the grocery stores, all I heard was two things. How terrible it was for that group of veterans who waited patiently for the torch to come by Friday, people who served their country to make it free enough to have those protests in the first place, denied the opportunity because the route had to change because of the protests. And the fact that protesters were damaging vehicles and businesses, supposedly in the name of getting some message out. Not one comment about the message.
And then there was someone who complained about police violence. Say what? Even the B.C. Civil Liberties Association has praised police for their restraint. And do you think the message gets out to people now afraid to take their kids downtown because they're afraid another incident could break out? I hardly think so.
One of the protest organizers says it's not a violent protest because people weren't hurt. Try telling that to some poor shop owner cowering in his store as someone smashes his windows. Or some poor mother and child trying to get out of the way while these terrorists roam the streets. It's quite possible that some of the violence Saturday was caused by violent people bent on destruction infiltrating legitimate protesters. Doesn't matter. The damage has been done. Even marches like the memorial yesterday to the missing Vancouver East Side women lost momentum because of the violence Saturday. Now the focus of any future protest will be on whether it turns violent, not on the message being put forward. Legitimate concerns have been put on the back burner by the actions of a few idiots. Unfortunate, but that's the mob mentality that often happens in these events.
A civil liberties advocate is concerned Saturday's protests in Vancouver may have diverted the message away from legitimate protesters taking advantage of the world spotlight for the Olympic Games. You think?
Legitimate protesters who have legitimate concerns are now in the unenviable position of losing their momentum on the world stage after 200 protesters smashed windows, spray painted vehicles and caused havoc while marching through the downtown core. It was an absolutely abysmal display. And did it take away from the protesters' message? Of course. How could it not?
When I was out and about on the weekend, at the local coffee shops, in the grocery stores, all I heard was two things. How terrible it was for that group of veterans who waited patiently for the torch to come by Friday, people who served their country to make it free enough to have those protests in the first place, denied the opportunity because the route had to change because of the protests. And the fact that protesters were damaging vehicles and businesses, supposedly in the name of getting some message out. Not one comment about the message.
And then there was someone who complained about police violence. Say what? Even the B.C. Civil Liberties Association has praised police for their restraint. And do you think the message gets out to people now afraid to take their kids downtown because they're afraid another incident could break out? I hardly think so.
One of the protest organizers says it's not a violent protest because people weren't hurt. Try telling that to some poor shop owner cowering in his store as someone smashes his windows. Or some poor mother and child trying to get out of the way while these terrorists roam the streets. It's quite possible that some of the violence Saturday was caused by violent people bent on destruction infiltrating legitimate protesters. Doesn't matter. The damage has been done. Even marches like the memorial yesterday to the missing Vancouver East Side women lost momentum because of the violence Saturday. Now the focus of any future protest will be on whether it turns violent, not on the message being put forward. Legitimate concerns have been put on the back burner by the actions of a few idiots. Unfortunate, but that's the mob mentality that often happens in these events.
Monday, February 15, 2010
Brock Trustees Meeting
Brock School Trustees Meeting
Last week's editorial on the Trustees meeting in Brock produced some interesting emails. Some of them are obviously written by very angry people, some by people who took the time to think things out a little more. As I said in the Editorial, I don't mind people who disagree with me, but when they make it personal, you have to wonder what makes people tick.
I enclose some of the many emails I received. I took out the names mainly to protect some peoples' ignorance.
Doug
1)
I couldn't agree more with your comments regarding the meeting at Brocklehurst. I as a parent was embarrassed and dismayed at the approach taken by many. Have we forgotten that even more important than what school our child attends is teaching them (many of whom were sitting right next to the parents) to be open minded, reasonable and respectful citizens?
That being said, I do understand their frustration and whether intentionally or not, they were blindsided. Yes, the board is doing their best in trying circumstances, but the plan they have put forth has not taken all factors into consideration, does not allow enough time to consider all of the implications and devise solutions for them, and creates HUGE inequality within our own city. As if Kamloops doesn't have enough division already...
Very respectfully submited :)
a future Brock parent.
2)
Wow, I wonder if you and I were at the same meeting? Were you at the meeting?
When I left the meeting I felt very proud of the North Shore residents. I think that they asked some important questions, raised some valid points, and demonstrated great respect for the trustees.
Most speakers made a point to thank the board for their efforts and their time. I can only think of one speaker who made a disrespectful remark. The community has a right to demand sound educational decisions, it is their tax dollars that pay for public education.
While middle schools may be gaining some popularity, it does not mean they are in the best interest of the students. Also, many of the speakers did not disagree with the idea of a middle school but rather with the time frame that the trustees have proposed.
Switching from a high school to a middle school is a major undertaking. Professional development for teachers to learn the new curriculum and new classroom management techniques, removing inappropriate books from the library and replacing them, creating a new school philosophy, developing age appropriate courses, creating a workable time table....the list goes on and on...Can that be done, successfully by next September?
Lastly, I do agree with Brock residents that they were blindsided. The trustees laid out a plan and people were prepared for the possibility that Brock may become a junior high. No where in that plan did it say anything about a middle school. This new proposal does cause a lot of chaos and uncertainty about transportation, sports, courses, and ultimately the well being of their children.
Perhaps your rant should have been directed toward our government that continues to financially slash public education and healthcare. I think that the 500+ (not 200 as reported by the media) people that showed up to the meeting at Brock should be commended for their activism and commitment to their community.
3)
Comment : Re: Brock Parents Fight for Conformity Was anyone from TV7 actually there?
If so, either they were from the \"favoured\" south shore, or they need a lesson or two in objective journalism...90% of the irate parents attending that meeting were NOT for conformity...they were about maintaining the status quo and protecting their childrens\' rights and opportunities as students and/or student athletes not to mention undue hardship for low income parents to provide SAFE transportation to and from the PROPOSED new schools. This proposed change impacts the majority of parents and children on the north shore in a negative or potentially negative fashion. What should be considered by all student parents in the north shore is breach of trust litigation and recall of all elected officials involved for this apparent \"throwing to the wolves\" of our children, their education, their opportunities for bursaries and scholarships, and, most importantly, their safety.
And Mr. \"One Man\'s Opinion\" Doug Collins should consider taking his fork out of that pie and actually attending the topic of his forays before inflicting his uneducated, biased opinion on the people of Kamloops. As a Brocklehurst resident, I would suggest that the School Board consider what the enrollment would be if all the designated catchment area students were forced to attend their \"catchment\" schools and quit finding reasons to keep South Shore schools open (my apologies to those who could be affected). Try one of these \"test\" runs in another area for a change...and cut the BS Mr. Spina; we all know that all school boards are under pressure to cut costs...imagine the lawsuit should one of these students be injured or harmed travelling out of his or her neighbourhood to live up to your supposed \"wave of the future\"...gutless wonders, the majority of our elected officials it seems (sorry Bev)
4)
Dear Doug,
You usually hit the nail right on the head. Tonight in your comments about the public meeting concerning the future of Brocklehust Secondary you were right on. Not one word was wasted. You expressed so well what needs to be said. My compliments and admiration.
For years I have travelled the province visiting schools and following education research. There are many exceptional middle schools in BC and the US, England and elsewhere serving their communities and students well. I have spent a lifetime in schools. Many as a student (20 between public elementary and secondary school, University, Post Graduate studies and diploma courses in North Carolina, McGill etc.) followed by 53 years as a professional educator (teacher, principal, school district and Ministry official). I have read much research and have experienced many grade configurations in Kamloops, BC, Canada, the USA, England, Germany, France and Ghana. The bottom line is that any configuration works if the community, parents , teachers and students make it work, get behind the school, are in involved in setting, and support the aims of the school. The most important thing that makes for successful schools is parent-teacher-student relations and respect. The most important "driver" in making decisions about school configuration is economics. Does it make economic sense? Enrolments have declined. Conditions have changed. I was the vice-principal of Brocklehurst Jr Sec.in 1968 (grades 8-10) and it was a very successful school as it was when it became an 8-12 School and can be if it becomes a Middle School. The School Board and District Administration are working hard to meet the challenging demands of declining enrolments and escalating costs. Change is rarely welcomed, but is a necessity of life. You expressed better than I could the current situation. Well done!! In a challenging and changing world we need clear thinkers, Thank goodness we have you!!
5)
To: Doug Collins: One Man\'s Opinion I was disappointed with your comments during last night\'s newscast regarding the new and surprising reconfiguration plans for the North Shore. Given your comments, I don\'t think you were at the meeting as you presented a misleading picture of the Brocklehurst students and parents. I was at the meeting and what I observed was students and parents who were passionate about their school and community and who asked that the North Shore receive equal treatment as compared to the South Shore and Westsyde. I believe that they have this right and I hope that you, as a longtime newsman, would also believe in this right.
Last week's editorial on the Trustees meeting in Brock produced some interesting emails. Some of them are obviously written by very angry people, some by people who took the time to think things out a little more. As I said in the Editorial, I don't mind people who disagree with me, but when they make it personal, you have to wonder what makes people tick.
I enclose some of the many emails I received. I took out the names mainly to protect some peoples' ignorance.
Doug
1)
I couldn't agree more with your comments regarding the meeting at Brocklehurst. I as a parent was embarrassed and dismayed at the approach taken by many. Have we forgotten that even more important than what school our child attends is teaching them (many of whom were sitting right next to the parents) to be open minded, reasonable and respectful citizens?
That being said, I do understand their frustration and whether intentionally or not, they were blindsided. Yes, the board is doing their best in trying circumstances, but the plan they have put forth has not taken all factors into consideration, does not allow enough time to consider all of the implications and devise solutions for them, and creates HUGE inequality within our own city. As if Kamloops doesn't have enough division already...
Very respectfully submited :)
a future Brock parent.
2)
Wow, I wonder if you and I were at the same meeting? Were you at the meeting?
When I left the meeting I felt very proud of the North Shore residents. I think that they asked some important questions, raised some valid points, and demonstrated great respect for the trustees.
Most speakers made a point to thank the board for their efforts and their time. I can only think of one speaker who made a disrespectful remark. The community has a right to demand sound educational decisions, it is their tax dollars that pay for public education.
While middle schools may be gaining some popularity, it does not mean they are in the best interest of the students. Also, many of the speakers did not disagree with the idea of a middle school but rather with the time frame that the trustees have proposed.
Switching from a high school to a middle school is a major undertaking. Professional development for teachers to learn the new curriculum and new classroom management techniques, removing inappropriate books from the library and replacing them, creating a new school philosophy, developing age appropriate courses, creating a workable time table....the list goes on and on...Can that be done, successfully by next September?
Lastly, I do agree with Brock residents that they were blindsided. The trustees laid out a plan and people were prepared for the possibility that Brock may become a junior high. No where in that plan did it say anything about a middle school. This new proposal does cause a lot of chaos and uncertainty about transportation, sports, courses, and ultimately the well being of their children.
Perhaps your rant should have been directed toward our government that continues to financially slash public education and healthcare. I think that the 500+ (not 200 as reported by the media) people that showed up to the meeting at Brock should be commended for their activism and commitment to their community.
3)
Comment : Re: Brock Parents Fight for Conformity Was anyone from TV7 actually there?
If so, either they were from the \"favoured\" south shore, or they need a lesson or two in objective journalism...90% of the irate parents attending that meeting were NOT for conformity...they were about maintaining the status quo and protecting their childrens\' rights and opportunities as students and/or student athletes not to mention undue hardship for low income parents to provide SAFE transportation to and from the PROPOSED new schools. This proposed change impacts the majority of parents and children on the north shore in a negative or potentially negative fashion. What should be considered by all student parents in the north shore is breach of trust litigation and recall of all elected officials involved for this apparent \"throwing to the wolves\" of our children, their education, their opportunities for bursaries and scholarships, and, most importantly, their safety.
And Mr. \"One Man\'s Opinion\" Doug Collins should consider taking his fork out of that pie and actually attending the topic of his forays before inflicting his uneducated, biased opinion on the people of Kamloops. As a Brocklehurst resident, I would suggest that the School Board consider what the enrollment would be if all the designated catchment area students were forced to attend their \"catchment\" schools and quit finding reasons to keep South Shore schools open (my apologies to those who could be affected). Try one of these \"test\" runs in another area for a change...and cut the BS Mr. Spina; we all know that all school boards are under pressure to cut costs...imagine the lawsuit should one of these students be injured or harmed travelling out of his or her neighbourhood to live up to your supposed \"wave of the future\"...gutless wonders, the majority of our elected officials it seems (sorry Bev)
4)
Dear Doug,
You usually hit the nail right on the head. Tonight in your comments about the public meeting concerning the future of Brocklehust Secondary you were right on. Not one word was wasted. You expressed so well what needs to be said. My compliments and admiration.
For years I have travelled the province visiting schools and following education research. There are many exceptional middle schools in BC and the US, England and elsewhere serving their communities and students well. I have spent a lifetime in schools. Many as a student (20 between public elementary and secondary school, University, Post Graduate studies and diploma courses in North Carolina, McGill etc.) followed by 53 years as a professional educator (teacher, principal, school district and Ministry official). I have read much research and have experienced many grade configurations in Kamloops, BC, Canada, the USA, England, Germany, France and Ghana. The bottom line is that any configuration works if the community, parents , teachers and students make it work, get behind the school, are in involved in setting, and support the aims of the school. The most important thing that makes for successful schools is parent-teacher-student relations and respect. The most important "driver" in making decisions about school configuration is economics. Does it make economic sense? Enrolments have declined. Conditions have changed. I was the vice-principal of Brocklehurst Jr Sec.in 1968 (grades 8-10) and it was a very successful school as it was when it became an 8-12 School and can be if it becomes a Middle School. The School Board and District Administration are working hard to meet the challenging demands of declining enrolments and escalating costs. Change is rarely welcomed, but is a necessity of life. You expressed better than I could the current situation. Well done!! In a challenging and changing world we need clear thinkers, Thank goodness we have you!!
5)
To: Doug Collins: One Man\'s Opinion I was disappointed with your comments during last night\'s newscast regarding the new and surprising reconfiguration plans for the North Shore. Given your comments, I don\'t think you were at the meeting as you presented a misleading picture of the Brocklehurst students and parents. I was at the meeting and what I observed was students and parents who were passionate about their school and community and who asked that the North Shore receive equal treatment as compared to the South Shore and Westsyde. I believe that they have this right and I hope that you, as a longtime newsman, would also believe in this right.
Sunday, February 14, 2010
Too Good to be True
(Aired on February 12, 2010)
It is hard to believe that people still get fooled by some of these scams that come to us via the internet. The internet has become one of the most-used and enjoyable inventions of the last 20 years. But it is fraught with people who want to rob us of our hard-earned cash. There are those we have some difficulty controlling, the hackers who break into the system and steal our financial information. Who get hold of our credit card numbers and try to access our accounts. We try to be as careful as we can, but internet transactions are more and more common, and in fact financial institutions often give us a break if we access our information online instead of getting a paper statement each month. We must take all precautions we can to avoid giving financial information to the wrong parties.
But there are many forms of fraud on the internet we do have control over. When we get the email from the Nigerian prince offering us a bunch of money to invest for him, we should simply hit the "delete" key on our computer. Don't bother reading it. As the old saying goes "if it looks too good to be true, it probably is." I can't believe how many people still get fooled by this type of scheme.
There are many forms of this scam, but they all amount to the same thing- you get overpaid by this scammer, and then you're to take what's left and send it back to him, or forward it to someone else. The cheque they send you bounces, you've already paid money to someone else, and you're holding the bag. Sometimes it's a few hundred dollars, other times, many thousands. Don't be fooled. Anything that looks suspicious, delete it. Don't respond to emails that seem to be coming from your bank or credit card company, asking you to reconfirm you financial details. Those are scams. Banks don't do that. If you're suspicious, call them to find out what's going on.
It's easy to be fooled on the internet. But there are lots of things to do to protect yourself. Number one is "don't buy into get-rich schemes." They are indeed too good to be true.
It is hard to believe that people still get fooled by some of these scams that come to us via the internet. The internet has become one of the most-used and enjoyable inventions of the last 20 years. But it is fraught with people who want to rob us of our hard-earned cash. There are those we have some difficulty controlling, the hackers who break into the system and steal our financial information. Who get hold of our credit card numbers and try to access our accounts. We try to be as careful as we can, but internet transactions are more and more common, and in fact financial institutions often give us a break if we access our information online instead of getting a paper statement each month. We must take all precautions we can to avoid giving financial information to the wrong parties.
But there are many forms of fraud on the internet we do have control over. When we get the email from the Nigerian prince offering us a bunch of money to invest for him, we should simply hit the "delete" key on our computer. Don't bother reading it. As the old saying goes "if it looks too good to be true, it probably is." I can't believe how many people still get fooled by this type of scheme.
There are many forms of this scam, but they all amount to the same thing- you get overpaid by this scammer, and then you're to take what's left and send it back to him, or forward it to someone else. The cheque they send you bounces, you've already paid money to someone else, and you're holding the bag. Sometimes it's a few hundred dollars, other times, many thousands. Don't be fooled. Anything that looks suspicious, delete it. Don't respond to emails that seem to be coming from your bank or credit card company, asking you to reconfirm you financial details. Those are scams. Banks don't do that. If you're suspicious, call them to find out what's going on.
It's easy to be fooled on the internet. But there are lots of things to do to protect yourself. Number one is "don't buy into get-rich schemes." They are indeed too good to be true.
Friday, February 12, 2010
Don't Ever Laugh at Me
Too late.
Abel Leblanc's meltdown in the New Brunswick legislature yesterday was absolutely magnificent. One of the most entertaining displays I've ever seen in Canadian politics. Check it out.
And here's a bit of explanation.
Abel Leblanc's meltdown in the New Brunswick legislature yesterday was absolutely magnificent. One of the most entertaining displays I've ever seen in Canadian politics. Check it out.
And here's a bit of explanation.
Attacks on Trustees Ignorant
(Aired on February 11, 2010)
I certainly don't mind people passionately defending their views on any subject whatsoever. I have never had issue with any person opposing my views on this program.
But when it starts to get personal, that's another story. And, unfortunately, that's what happened earlier this week when parents in the Brocklehurst area turned out to oppose a proposed plan for a middle school in their area. They didn't like the idea - it's their right to state their views. But quite frankly, many of these parents were just ignorant in their comments, suggesting the Board blindsided them, or sabotaged them by bringing up the middle school idea. They demeaned the board in their comments, and tried to suggest that the board had the middle school idea in mind all the time, and had a hidden agenda.
That's a bunch of crap, and those parents should be ashamed of themselves for their attitude and the way they talked the other night. I understand they're upset. I get it. But I don't get making a personal attack on people who are trying to find solutions in the midst of very trying situations.
The School Board is dealing with a serious issue - funding is not enough, enrollment is declining. Changes have to be made. Middle schools are becoming more and more popular. Why not try it, especially in an area where it makes sense? To suggest that the Board is picking on Brocklehurst parents by putting a middle school there and nowhere else is just illogical at best, and ignorant at worst. The comments of some parents Tuesday night were just plain hurtful, and to deal with a tough situation by personal attacks doesn't help anyone.
That was a tough night for trustees. They've been diligent in having this brutal series of public meetings so they can meet face to face with the people. It's been very demanding and very very stressful. They could have easily made changes without the kind of public consultation they chose. They should be commended for the way they're trying to deal with the problem, not kicked in the teeth like they were the other night.
I certainly don't mind people passionately defending their views on any subject whatsoever. I have never had issue with any person opposing my views on this program.
But when it starts to get personal, that's another story. And, unfortunately, that's what happened earlier this week when parents in the Brocklehurst area turned out to oppose a proposed plan for a middle school in their area. They didn't like the idea - it's their right to state their views. But quite frankly, many of these parents were just ignorant in their comments, suggesting the Board blindsided them, or sabotaged them by bringing up the middle school idea. They demeaned the board in their comments, and tried to suggest that the board had the middle school idea in mind all the time, and had a hidden agenda.
That's a bunch of crap, and those parents should be ashamed of themselves for their attitude and the way they talked the other night. I understand they're upset. I get it. But I don't get making a personal attack on people who are trying to find solutions in the midst of very trying situations.
The School Board is dealing with a serious issue - funding is not enough, enrollment is declining. Changes have to be made. Middle schools are becoming more and more popular. Why not try it, especially in an area where it makes sense? To suggest that the Board is picking on Brocklehurst parents by putting a middle school there and nowhere else is just illogical at best, and ignorant at worst. The comments of some parents Tuesday night were just plain hurtful, and to deal with a tough situation by personal attacks doesn't help anyone.
That was a tough night for trustees. They've been diligent in having this brutal series of public meetings so they can meet face to face with the people. It's been very demanding and very very stressful. They could have easily made changes without the kind of public consultation they chose. They should be commended for the way they're trying to deal with the problem, not kicked in the teeth like they were the other night.
Thursday, February 11, 2010
More Parking Troubles Coming for RIH
(Aired on February 10, 2010)
Two years ago when my wife and I had our first child, I used this space to bemoan the sorry state of parking at Royal Inland Hospital. Now, as we are expecting our second child, I have to bring up the situation again. This time, it's not the hospital itself I have a beef with.
City council moved yesterday to add parking meters to Third and Fourth Avenues, in the blocks closest to the hospital. This was already a two-hour limit zone, but by-law officials themselves admitted it was a tough one to enforce, meaning many people parking there could rest a little easier if their hospital appointments went overtime. Now, it will remain a two-hour zone, with regular metered rates, and by-law officers say they will have an easier time enforcing those rules.
I should also note that city staff have made it no secret that this is a revenue generator. The 43 new meters will bring in about $28,000 to city coffers annually.
Normally, I wouldn't have a big problem with something like this, but this is a special case. Royal Inland Hospital has quite possibly the worst parking situation of any property in the entire city. Though Interior Health officials have pledged to make changes to address the problem, it's clear that making R.I.H. a regional health centre has led to far more demand for parking than was originally predicted. Patients and visitors are forced to search for parking off-site, many of them using street-side spots on Third and Fourth. To install meters there borders on predatory.
The city is already banking on a huge increase in revenue from parking thanks to a new high-tech enforcement method that will lead to far more tickets being issued. It seems this is an area where the city could have called off the dogs - at least until Royal Inland has addressed its own problems.
Two years ago when my wife and I had our first child, I used this space to bemoan the sorry state of parking at Royal Inland Hospital. Now, as we are expecting our second child, I have to bring up the situation again. This time, it's not the hospital itself I have a beef with.
City council moved yesterday to add parking meters to Third and Fourth Avenues, in the blocks closest to the hospital. This was already a two-hour limit zone, but by-law officials themselves admitted it was a tough one to enforce, meaning many people parking there could rest a little easier if their hospital appointments went overtime. Now, it will remain a two-hour zone, with regular metered rates, and by-law officers say they will have an easier time enforcing those rules.
I should also note that city staff have made it no secret that this is a revenue generator. The 43 new meters will bring in about $28,000 to city coffers annually.
Normally, I wouldn't have a big problem with something like this, but this is a special case. Royal Inland Hospital has quite possibly the worst parking situation of any property in the entire city. Though Interior Health officials have pledged to make changes to address the problem, it's clear that making R.I.H. a regional health centre has led to far more demand for parking than was originally predicted. Patients and visitors are forced to search for parking off-site, many of them using street-side spots on Third and Fourth. To install meters there borders on predatory.
The city is already banking on a huge increase in revenue from parking thanks to a new high-tech enforcement method that will lead to far more tickets being issued. It seems this is an area where the city could have called off the dogs - at least until Royal Inland has addressed its own problems.
Tuesday, February 9, 2010
No Problem with Mayor Attending Opening Ceremonies
(Aired on February 8, 2010)
The current minor controversy regarding whether or not officials should be using complementary tickets to Olympics events is too much ado about nothing. Kamloops Mayor Peter Milobar is among those using tickets provided by various groups, in his case the B.C. Lottery Corporation. Other officials, like the Mayor of Chilliwack, have opted not to. In my view, it's an individual decision, and as long as it's transparent, I don't really see a problem. If our Mayor can use the event to do some networking on behalf of the city, what's the problem? City officials get invited to events all the time. In many cases, they get a free ticket for themselves, and perhaps their spouse. There may be some who see that as a conflict of interest. They believe that there should not only be no conflict, there should be no perception of a conflict. But we expect our civic officials to be at various events to represent us, and to glad hand the public. I don't think that's a bad thing.
And, again, as long as it's transparent, it's not an issue. It doesn't make a councilor a bad person, or a shady character, as some would have you believe. Some see this as an issue. I think they're really being silly if they think a councilor would give a benefit to a company because they got a ticket to a dinner. But they're entitled to their opinion. Unless the taxpayers are going to give the Mayor and Council a much bigger expense account, it's a moot point for me.
I know there are some self-righteous people out there who would argue against my views, but I guess that's their right. We've had this issue in newsrooms across the country over the years. Some, for example, never go to a function unless their company pays the freight for the ticket. They don't want to be seen as taking "favours" from someone. And that's OK. Many functions have media tables where the media can sit to cover an event, and they don't have to eat the dinner if they don't want, to show how pure they are.
But events for mayor and council are a little different, and part of their responsibility is to be in the public and represent the taxpayers. As far as Mayor Milobar's trip to the opening ceremonies goes, Peter, have a great time, enjoy the event, and forget about those who for some reason can't see the bigger picture.
The current minor controversy regarding whether or not officials should be using complementary tickets to Olympics events is too much ado about nothing. Kamloops Mayor Peter Milobar is among those using tickets provided by various groups, in his case the B.C. Lottery Corporation. Other officials, like the Mayor of Chilliwack, have opted not to. In my view, it's an individual decision, and as long as it's transparent, I don't really see a problem. If our Mayor can use the event to do some networking on behalf of the city, what's the problem? City officials get invited to events all the time. In many cases, they get a free ticket for themselves, and perhaps their spouse. There may be some who see that as a conflict of interest. They believe that there should not only be no conflict, there should be no perception of a conflict. But we expect our civic officials to be at various events to represent us, and to glad hand the public. I don't think that's a bad thing.
And, again, as long as it's transparent, it's not an issue. It doesn't make a councilor a bad person, or a shady character, as some would have you believe. Some see this as an issue. I think they're really being silly if they think a councilor would give a benefit to a company because they got a ticket to a dinner. But they're entitled to their opinion. Unless the taxpayers are going to give the Mayor and Council a much bigger expense account, it's a moot point for me.
I know there are some self-righteous people out there who would argue against my views, but I guess that's their right. We've had this issue in newsrooms across the country over the years. Some, for example, never go to a function unless their company pays the freight for the ticket. They don't want to be seen as taking "favours" from someone. And that's OK. Many functions have media tables where the media can sit to cover an event, and they don't have to eat the dinner if they don't want, to show how pure they are.
But events for mayor and council are a little different, and part of their responsibility is to be in the public and represent the taxpayers. As far as Mayor Milobar's trip to the opening ceremonies goes, Peter, have a great time, enjoy the event, and forget about those who for some reason can't see the bigger picture.
Monday, February 8, 2010
The Party's at Sun Peaks
(Aired on February 5, 2010)
I'm surprised it's taken this long for controversy over partiers at Sun Peaks to come to light. Some residents who live at the Peaks are upset with the constant partying of some of their neighbours. Well, not their neighbours per se. For the most part, they are people who are renting their neighbour's homes. Hotel operators and residents alike are upset at some who rent their properties out to partiers on a nightly basis, almost like a hotel. They are noisy, and mostly pains in the butt.
Unfortunately, they are prevalent in places like Sun Peaks, just like they are at the Shuswap in the summer time. I don't know how you can avoid it. I sympathize with the residents who want to enjoy a beautiful life at the mountain, or on the lake. But I don't know what control they might have over the idiots who create the problems.
I'm not familiar with the developmental rules at the hill. I know things like time shares are commonplace in some resorts, and I'm not sure whether or not all subdivisions in a place like Sun Peaks operate under the same guidelines. But if there are rules in place, they should be followed, and should be enforced. If people are renting out their places illegally, they should be fined. Unfortunately, there are many ways around the rules, and people bent on bending them won't have any trouble doing so.
The issue is not as easily resolved as some might think. Resorts, and recreational properties in general, definitely have a different set of guidelines than subdivisions within a city. Whereas I should expect to be able to enjoy peace and quiet in my own home in the city, if I own a property in a resort area, like Sun Peaks or the Shuswap, should I expect the same rights, when there are revellers out enjoying themselves on a summer or winter evening?
It's not an easy situation to resolve, but the TNRD needs to get a handle on it. It's obviously a concern, and it needs to be dealt with before it blows totally out of proportion. I like my peace and quiet, and I wouldn't probably buy a place where partying is part of the atmosphere. On the other hand, where does the line get drawn between a fun time and all-out stupidness. That's the issue that needs some serious attention.
I'm surprised it's taken this long for controversy over partiers at Sun Peaks to come to light. Some residents who live at the Peaks are upset with the constant partying of some of their neighbours. Well, not their neighbours per se. For the most part, they are people who are renting their neighbour's homes. Hotel operators and residents alike are upset at some who rent their properties out to partiers on a nightly basis, almost like a hotel. They are noisy, and mostly pains in the butt.
Unfortunately, they are prevalent in places like Sun Peaks, just like they are at the Shuswap in the summer time. I don't know how you can avoid it. I sympathize with the residents who want to enjoy a beautiful life at the mountain, or on the lake. But I don't know what control they might have over the idiots who create the problems.
I'm not familiar with the developmental rules at the hill. I know things like time shares are commonplace in some resorts, and I'm not sure whether or not all subdivisions in a place like Sun Peaks operate under the same guidelines. But if there are rules in place, they should be followed, and should be enforced. If people are renting out their places illegally, they should be fined. Unfortunately, there are many ways around the rules, and people bent on bending them won't have any trouble doing so.
The issue is not as easily resolved as some might think. Resorts, and recreational properties in general, definitely have a different set of guidelines than subdivisions within a city. Whereas I should expect to be able to enjoy peace and quiet in my own home in the city, if I own a property in a resort area, like Sun Peaks or the Shuswap, should I expect the same rights, when there are revellers out enjoying themselves on a summer or winter evening?
It's not an easy situation to resolve, but the TNRD needs to get a handle on it. It's obviously a concern, and it needs to be dealt with before it blows totally out of proportion. I like my peace and quiet, and I wouldn't probably buy a place where partying is part of the atmosphere. On the other hand, where does the line get drawn between a fun time and all-out stupidness. That's the issue that needs some serious attention.
Friday, February 5, 2010
Rebuilding Haiti Won't Happen Quickly
(Aired on February 4, 2010)
The magnitude 7 earthquake in Haiti occurred January 12th, and three weeks later, it's still almost impossible to get a handle on the devastation. And the scary part is that the country is in such turmoil, and the government so disorganized that people continue to die because of the incompetence.
Relief supplies not arriving in a timely manner, or stolen by corrupt public officials who sell them on the black market. Squalid conditions for survivors, large populations of small children whose parents have been killed, wandering aimlessly, starving to death, no medication, no hope for the future.
It's hard to imagine what's going on there. It would be like suddenly, everyone in the city of Vancouver was without a home, wandering in the streets, death and destruction everywhere. That's hard to imagine. So we really have difficulty forming a clear picture.
One picture that isn't too hard to form, however, is the picture of the country five years down the road. And it's not a pretty picture. With a country so unstable, it's hard to imagine changes and recovery will come quickly. When we look at the devastation of Hurricane Katrina in 2005, we realize how long it takes to rebuild after a catastrophe. Thousands and thousands are still displaced. Many neighbourhoods will never be rebuilt. We look at the problems of getting supplies to victims there. This in the most powerful and prosperous country in the world, where money and resources are not an issue. Compare that to the problems in Haiti, and you can only imagine how long it will take.
We have people from Kamloops right now helping to rebuild areas of Sri Lanka, hit by that huge tsunami in December of 2004. Rebuilding is still going on. We can't picture the sadness, outside of what we see in the news, which is nowhere near what it's like in real life. What we do know is that this country will require the world's help for a long time, and it will be decades before Haiti gets over the economic, let alone the personal destruction of that freak of nature that hit them last month.
The magnitude 7 earthquake in Haiti occurred January 12th, and three weeks later, it's still almost impossible to get a handle on the devastation. And the scary part is that the country is in such turmoil, and the government so disorganized that people continue to die because of the incompetence.
Relief supplies not arriving in a timely manner, or stolen by corrupt public officials who sell them on the black market. Squalid conditions for survivors, large populations of small children whose parents have been killed, wandering aimlessly, starving to death, no medication, no hope for the future.
It's hard to imagine what's going on there. It would be like suddenly, everyone in the city of Vancouver was without a home, wandering in the streets, death and destruction everywhere. That's hard to imagine. So we really have difficulty forming a clear picture.
One picture that isn't too hard to form, however, is the picture of the country five years down the road. And it's not a pretty picture. With a country so unstable, it's hard to imagine changes and recovery will come quickly. When we look at the devastation of Hurricane Katrina in 2005, we realize how long it takes to rebuild after a catastrophe. Thousands and thousands are still displaced. Many neighbourhoods will never be rebuilt. We look at the problems of getting supplies to victims there. This in the most powerful and prosperous country in the world, where money and resources are not an issue. Compare that to the problems in Haiti, and you can only imagine how long it will take.
We have people from Kamloops right now helping to rebuild areas of Sri Lanka, hit by that huge tsunami in December of 2004. Rebuilding is still going on. We can't picture the sadness, outside of what we see in the news, which is nowhere near what it's like in real life. What we do know is that this country will require the world's help for a long time, and it will be decades before Haiti gets over the economic, let alone the personal destruction of that freak of nature that hit them last month.
Thursday, February 4, 2010
I Hate Being Told to Shut Up
(Aired on February 3, 2010)
Since last week's editorial, in which I decried the cost of the olympics, there have been two responses. First, I received an overwhelmingly positive response from viewers and blog readers. Second are the multiple columns and blog postings that popped up shortly thereafter saying that people who are bringing up points like this should stop whining.
Don't worry, I am still insecure enough to think that this may have nothing whatsoever to do with me.
The "shut up and look happy" crowd says if the world sees dissent here, they won't want to come here, and this huge marketing experiment will have all been for naught. The problem with that argument is that - as far as i know - the demonstration of a free society does not discourage tourism, immigration or investment. I'm not actually saying there should be massive disruptions to the event. Protests are okay, though. That's what happens in the free world, and no reasonable person would judge a place solely based on that. The only thing that would tarnish a city's image is if those protestors are repressed in contravention of the universal declaration of human rights.
The "shut up and look happy" crowd has said opponents are too late to change anything. That's completely true. It would take an act of God to cancel the games, and I've long since stopped praying for that. Indeed at this point, it's not in anyone's best interest. But why should that stop people from voicing their opinion on the relative validity of something that will cost us all?
People who are trying to quiet dissent remind of me of parents begging their children to behave when company comes over. Maybe I'll react differently when my own children are old enough to frustrate my hosting efforts. For now, it just makes me want to throw a bigger tantrum, and one I won't apologize for.
Since last week's editorial, in which I decried the cost of the olympics, there have been two responses. First, I received an overwhelmingly positive response from viewers and blog readers. Second are the multiple columns and blog postings that popped up shortly thereafter saying that people who are bringing up points like this should stop whining.
Don't worry, I am still insecure enough to think that this may have nothing whatsoever to do with me.
The "shut up and look happy" crowd says if the world sees dissent here, they won't want to come here, and this huge marketing experiment will have all been for naught. The problem with that argument is that - as far as i know - the demonstration of a free society does not discourage tourism, immigration or investment. I'm not actually saying there should be massive disruptions to the event. Protests are okay, though. That's what happens in the free world, and no reasonable person would judge a place solely based on that. The only thing that would tarnish a city's image is if those protestors are repressed in contravention of the universal declaration of human rights.
The "shut up and look happy" crowd has said opponents are too late to change anything. That's completely true. It would take an act of God to cancel the games, and I've long since stopped praying for that. Indeed at this point, it's not in anyone's best interest. But why should that stop people from voicing their opinion on the relative validity of something that will cost us all?
People who are trying to quiet dissent remind of me of parents begging their children to behave when company comes over. Maybe I'll react differently when my own children are old enough to frustrate my hosting efforts. For now, it just makes me want to throw a bigger tantrum, and one I won't apologize for.
Tuesday, February 2, 2010
Working to End Homelessness
(Aired on February 1, 2010)
I must laud cities like Vancouver who are anxious to make inroads into dealing with the problem of homelessness. Vancouver is looking at an action plan that will, over the next five years, come to grips with the program. Vancouver's problem is one of the most identifiable in the country. There are over 3,000 homeless in the Greater Vancouver area, and because of the climate, it's more visible than it is in many other communities.
But while I laud Vancouver's efforts, I wonder how successful they can be. This is a huge problem to defeat, partly because many of these homeless people are so seriously disenfranchised. They have become lost souls in a sea of heartbreak. They have in most cases lost contact with their families, they want to be ghosts, they don't want to reintegrate. In many case, they just want to be left alone. I've had occasion to talk to a few of them, those whose minds have been wracked by drug habits, by health issues, by mental issues, and it's absolutely the worst thing I've ever seen. The people who work with the homeless are heroes in my books. The people who run the shelters, trying to reach out to those on the street, they do absolutely magnificent work. But despite their best efforts, the problems continue.
And they're not easy to fix. Some think the government should just throw bundles at the problem, and that will cure all. Sorry, it's much for difficult than that. In fact, the problem is almost hopeless for many of these people. While we continue to need shelters, medical help and ways to meet some of their needs, the real issue is finding ways to plug up the cracks that allow these people to get to where they find their only solution is to get out in the streets to live.
This is a tough problem to deal with. It's a tragedy, and there is no real easy fix. At least Vancouver and other communities are making an effort. That's a start.
I must laud cities like Vancouver who are anxious to make inroads into dealing with the problem of homelessness. Vancouver is looking at an action plan that will, over the next five years, come to grips with the program. Vancouver's problem is one of the most identifiable in the country. There are over 3,000 homeless in the Greater Vancouver area, and because of the climate, it's more visible than it is in many other communities.
But while I laud Vancouver's efforts, I wonder how successful they can be. This is a huge problem to defeat, partly because many of these homeless people are so seriously disenfranchised. They have become lost souls in a sea of heartbreak. They have in most cases lost contact with their families, they want to be ghosts, they don't want to reintegrate. In many case, they just want to be left alone. I've had occasion to talk to a few of them, those whose minds have been wracked by drug habits, by health issues, by mental issues, and it's absolutely the worst thing I've ever seen. The people who work with the homeless are heroes in my books. The people who run the shelters, trying to reach out to those on the street, they do absolutely magnificent work. But despite their best efforts, the problems continue.
And they're not easy to fix. Some think the government should just throw bundles at the problem, and that will cure all. Sorry, it's much for difficult than that. In fact, the problem is almost hopeless for many of these people. While we continue to need shelters, medical help and ways to meet some of their needs, the real issue is finding ways to plug up the cracks that allow these people to get to where they find their only solution is to get out in the streets to live.
This is a tough problem to deal with. It's a tragedy, and there is no real easy fix. At least Vancouver and other communities are making an effort. That's a start.
Monday, February 1, 2010
Kudos to Toyota
Toyota hasn't been having a lot of fun these days, thanks to accelerator pedals that stick. Every once in a while. The company has received a ton of publicity that it probably doesn't want.
But think of it this way. All car companies encounter quality problems. That's true whether its Toyota, a company with a terrific reputation for quality, or any other automobile manufacturer. Some of those quality problems turn out to be safety risks, some don't. All a company can do is try to get out in front of it as quickly as possible, spare no expense and fix the problem. It sounds like that is exactly what Toyota is doing. Good on them.
(Full disclosure: Sun Country Toyota runs advertisements with CFJC. This comment is not one of them. I've upset advertisers before, though, so I don't feel too bad.)
(UPDATE - Feb.3): Since I wrote this comment, it turns out all may not be as it seems. Yeesh.)
(ANOTHER UPDATE - Feb.4): I think it's probably time for me to take back what I said. If Prius brake pedals are now faulty, that puts Hollywood stars at risk, and I simply can't tolerate that.
But think of it this way. All car companies encounter quality problems. That's true whether its Toyota, a company with a terrific reputation for quality, or any other automobile manufacturer. Some of those quality problems turn out to be safety risks, some don't. All a company can do is try to get out in front of it as quickly as possible, spare no expense and fix the problem. It sounds like that is exactly what Toyota is doing. Good on them.
(Full disclosure: Sun Country Toyota runs advertisements with CFJC. This comment is not one of them. I've upset advertisers before, though, so I don't feel too bad.)
(UPDATE - Feb.3): Since I wrote this comment, it turns out all may not be as it seems. Yeesh.)
(ANOTHER UPDATE - Feb.4): I think it's probably time for me to take back what I said. If Prius brake pedals are now faulty, that puts Hollywood stars at risk, and I simply can't tolerate that.
Time is Now for Water Meter Decision
(Aired on January 29, 2010)
Mayor Peter Milobar is right. He says it's time for the rubble to meet the road when it comes to water meters. City Council is facing a huge spending increase for water projects, if they don't put in universal water meters. Council will be forced to spend a huge chunk of money to upgrade the Valleyview system because of increased demand. If water meters are installed, they won't have to do that for many years down the road. It's just the start of the problem.
You can say what you will, but this is a decision that has to be made now. Water rates will go up for the construction, but in the long run, it's the right thing to do. And contrary to some armchair quarterbacks, we can't go to a referendum on this. Councillors have to have the courage of their convictions and make the necessary decision. That's why we elected them. If the public doesn't like what they do, there's an election in November 2011 when they can let the council know they did or did not back their decision.
If we can reduce water consumption by 20 percent in peak periods, the savings to the system will be huge. As Kamloops continues to grow, demands will continue to be placed on our water capacity. We already know that we overwater. Water meters will help keep that in check. Let's not play around with this any more. Let's get the job underway and make the decision. Council has wasted enough time.
Mayor Peter Milobar is right. He says it's time for the rubble to meet the road when it comes to water meters. City Council is facing a huge spending increase for water projects, if they don't put in universal water meters. Council will be forced to spend a huge chunk of money to upgrade the Valleyview system because of increased demand. If water meters are installed, they won't have to do that for many years down the road. It's just the start of the problem.
You can say what you will, but this is a decision that has to be made now. Water rates will go up for the construction, but in the long run, it's the right thing to do. And contrary to some armchair quarterbacks, we can't go to a referendum on this. Councillors have to have the courage of their convictions and make the necessary decision. That's why we elected them. If the public doesn't like what they do, there's an election in November 2011 when they can let the council know they did or did not back their decision.
If we can reduce water consumption by 20 percent in peak periods, the savings to the system will be huge. As Kamloops continues to grow, demands will continue to be placed on our water capacity. We already know that we overwater. Water meters will help keep that in check. Let's not play around with this any more. Let's get the job underway and make the decision. Council has wasted enough time.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
